Topo Map CD v1.2 released 6 September, 2007
Posted by blisterfree in Uncategorized.add a comment
Attention current Topo Map Set owners, and autumn G.E.T. hikers-in-planning:
Grand Enchantment Trail Topo Map Set CD v1.2 is now available. This version replaces v1.1 as the latest and most accurate collection of topographic maps available for the route. The updated information represented on this CD-Rom corresponds with updates and changes to the online guidebook, and includes:
+ Clarification and correction of navigational information, based on my experiences along the route this spring, but especially upon those of other hikers who were out there this year. Thanks, folks!
+ Representations of alternate route possibilities, including new alternate routes (some tested, some not), as well as the “decommissioning” of alternates routes that haven’t worked or aren’t likely to make sense for most hikers. (E.g., the Black Rock Alternate in Segment 8 has been removed, and the as-yet-untested North Santa Teresa Alternate, same segment, is represented instead. The Buford Hill Alternate has been simplified. And in Segment 10, the Blue Jay Ridge Trail is now part of the FR 286 Alternate alignment, which most hikers will use.)
+ Improved GPS waypoint accuracy, as well as new waypoint data to correspond with changes in the route.
+ Small changes to cumulative mileage figures from the west terminus near Phoenix. These mileage changes are uniformly represented in the guidebook, town guide, and water chart, as well as overview maps.
Before anyone gets a headache, let me just point out that these changes – both in the v1.2 mapset and in the guide – are, for the most part, small. So if you’re not planning to spend time along the route this autumn, then you really don’t need the upgrade. If you are, and you currently own v1.1 or v1.0, then I would recommend making the upgrade, which is essentially free to do. Anyone who owns an existing map CD can go to http://simblissity.net/get-topo-cd.htm and click on Add to Cart where it says “Upgrade” to get the latest maps. The only other recommendation would be to do so before next Monday (9/10), as the online store will be closing down for a few weeks (just before I’m due to hit the trail, not so coincidentally!).
I’ve spent my pre-hike time this summer plugging away at this, rather than on expanding the guidebook. It seemed more important to make the existing route description and maps as accurate and in agreement as possible, before moving the narration, so to speak, farther ahead into New Mexico. So currently, as it has been, the guidebook ends with Segment 18, just over the NM line from AZ. From there, heading east, hikers will need to make due with the maps alone. What this means for westbound hikers this autumn is that they’ll be navigating by map, compass, GPS, and/or gut sense, for the first 400 or so miles. At that point, from Glenwood on, they’ll be able to use the guidebook, albeit with descriptions primarily written for the eastbound hiker. And yet, I suspect that autumn westbounders may still have it somewhat easier than springtime eastbounders, as the route in New Mexico is generally more straightforward than in Arizona; the maps alone should generally suffice; and the experience gained by the time they’ve entered Arizona will serve them well for the challenges ahead.
My fall hike will hopefully give me the chance to come away with the most up-to-date info possible for New Mexico and the remaining guidebook chapters, which will begin to appear later this fall and throughout the winter months. With any luck the whole enchilada will be ready by spring 2008, with the release of Map Set v2.0.
If you’ve been thinking about giving the Grand Enchantment Trail a try this autumn, the weather and water outlook are both looking favorable. The Southwest has seen plenty of moisture this monsoon season, with more on the way, and the water situation should be good throughout the fall. When summer is wet, autumn thru-hiking is undeniably easier than in spring – the weather is cooler, the sun less intense, the snowpack is long gone, and most water crossings are benign. Add in the aspens in their golden hues, fall wildflowers in the middle elevations, and coyotes yipping all through the long Sonoran November nights, and the memories are sure to be grand, indeed.
Happy trails,
- blisterfree
GET in vids 6 August, 2007
Posted by blisterfree in Uncategorized.add a comment
For anyone interested, I’ve recently discovered my digital still camera’s video feature and am hoping to give it some use on my upcoming fall hike. The route is pretty well documented photographically now, but video would seem to be a whole new realm worth exploring. Likely I’ll return with a series of “vignettes” – 30-60 seconds a piece, small and grainy (heck, it’s a 7 oz point and shoot), but hopefully lending some sense of immediacy and realism beyond what’s often possible with still imagery.
In the meantime, here’s a few samples from Sandia Crest environs. (Note to self: man, that’s some grainy video. Next time maybe up the resolution just a wee tad.)
Sandia Crest:
http://outdoors.webshots.com/video/3060340670038317822hjvJQr
Kiwanis Meadow:
http://outdoors.webshots.com/video/3074061650038317822FeznpT
Rock squirrel:
http://outdoors.webshots.com/video/3043670380038317822AjSgBA
Happy trails,
- blisterfree
The Terrain Underfoot 3 August, 2007
Posted by blisterfree in Uncategorized.add a comment
And the geospatial analysis, as they say, “goes on.”
It dawned on me recently that the route might benefit from another map. Or rather, that hikers might benefit from another map. Or, in the absence of any GET hikers here in early August, that gawking at maps might at least entertain the trail dreamers among us – encouraging us to keep on dreamin’ a little while longer.
But not just any old map would do, of course. So here’s something a little different:
http://simblissity.net/images/GET/get-by-surface-type.jpg
The GET follows a wide variety of “underfoot surfaces” on its 700+ mile journey – existing trails, dirt roads, pavement (very rarely), and cross-country terrain (mostly along drainage courses). As detailed on the website’s main page, approximately 400 miles of the route currently follow trails, with a majority of the rest located along primitive dirt roads or “2-tracks.” But while breaking out the mileages by surface type is useful to get a sense of what’s out there, numbers alone say nothing about the presentation – of what the proverbial thru-hiker will actually experience on a day-to-day basis, hiking eastbound or westbound.
And so, the map…
I’ve organized this under “Overview Maps” (see the Nav Box on the site). On the Overview Maps main page, click the “View More Maps” box to find “Surface Types of the GET.” (For visual clarity, be sure to maximize the size of the full-page map.)
Color-coding the various “surface types” really highlights the route’s personality, showing the big picture undecipherable from the guide text alone. The red line segments indicate where the route follows trails, and yellow where it uses primitive roads; together these surfaces comprise a majority of the hiking experience, as can readily be seen on the map. Of particular note is the extent of almost continuous trail walking in the Gila National Forest, the GET’s approximate mid-point and an eagerly anticipated section for most hikers. Trail tread is likewise more continuous near the route’s termini at PHX and ABQ, but is also regularly encountered throughout the entire route, if not every day (for most hikers) than often enough to quench the thirst, should that be necessary.
I suppose there aren’t yet enough of us to form any sort of consensus, but some GET hikers might agree that they red (trail), yellow (primitive dirt), and green (x-country) sections shown on the map all mostly allow for a quality hiking experience – away from vehicles most of the time, remote, scenic, and surrounded by wild nature. For example, note the “green stretches” west of Klondyke, AZ, which include the untrailed drainage walk along Aravaipa Creek’s wash and in Aravaipa Canyon itself. (Or the similarly green experience at the San Francisco and Blue river canyons near the AZ/NM border.) Also of note is the section from Magdalena to Mountainair, conspicuously absent of trail tread, but replete with the “greens and yellows” that promise a remote, wilderness-like experience through terrain unknown to most.
If, as the saying goes, the whole is greater than the sum of its parts, then it’s the diverse assemblage of parts that take the GET to another level for me. From end to end, the route is a veritable rainbow of hiking experiences – red to yellow, green, indigo, and back again – with each successive color on the map promising new adventures, challenges, rewards… memories. Along the way, as any worthwhile walk will allow, I’ve experienced the full spectrum of emotions out there. But among them, boredom and disinterest are not. Certainly I’ve been there before, elsewhere, but here, on the GET, the absence of monotony, of predictability, that comes with the ever-changing landscapes and terrain seems to maintain the interest level from day to day. What’s around the next corner? What new experience awaits? Even after all this time, I still find myself asking. And usually, glad for the answer that comes.
Town Guide & Water Chart updates 8 July, 2007
Posted by blisterfree in Uncategorized.add a comment
Well, here we are already, steadily approaching midsummer. How can it be that spring GET hiking season is nearly 3 months gone already … ? Was it April 13 that I’d left the trail from Winston environs, with mad thoughts of stealing a bicycle and riding to Truth or Consequences – whatever it would take to get out and get home. So it was, indeed. And so here I am now, homebound in the safe suburban paradise of a New England summer and wishing I were anywhere but! It’s green as life itself outside, an indolent breeze floats in through the window, but all I can seem to think about is the coming of autumn. Of good hard work in the desert, and chilly nights among the mountain pines. Fall hiking season can’t be that far away, now, can it?
In the meantime, time a-plenty for some good hard desk work.
I’ve updated the GET Town Guide for 2007. The post office information is largely unchanged – a slight shift in hours here or there, but all addresses and zip codes are as they were. Some of the services info has changed since last year – nothing too drastic. Near Safford, the community of Solomon – a late arrival to the list of trail towns – now receives its fair due. Besides a post office, hikers will find a Mexican restaurant here as well as a small convenience store. The Town Guide also contains updated info on Winston and Chloride. Many thanks to Jim and Ginny Owen for their recent report on Magdalena, Polvadera, and Lemitar. Although I didn’t get to visit these towns this spring, I have since phoned the “hiker spots” here and elsewhere. The info on stove fuel (esp. HEET) availability is as current as it gets, although it’s still not entirely promising and, as always, it could change tomorrow.
The Water Chart is also current, with spring 2007 observations from PHX to Winston. The chart now offers a total of 4 seasons worth of data. Along with my planned fall hike and following report, the ‘07 data should eventually offer a snapshot of the entire route.
Prospects for Solitude: Digging for gold in them thar hills 11 June, 2007
Posted by blisterfree in Uncategorized.add a comment
Equally inspiring as mountaintop vistas and moments of connection with nature are the opportunities for solitude I seek on my long hikes, most especially along the Grand Enchantment Trail.
The notion of solitude means different things to different
people. For some, solitude could be an hour’s walk away from
the car in woods near home, encountering no other people.
For others, a weekend backpacking trip along the Appalachian
Trail can provide sufficient solitude, meeting other hikers
here and there, perhaps camping among others, but for the
most part traveling alone.
Most long-distance hikers I’ve met spend the majority of
their time walking alone, or at least at a certain
figurative distance from other people, moving quietly
through their own thoughts and emotions. To varying degrees
we all experience some definition of solitude on our hikes.
For some hikers the solitude may be more than they would
prefer, or the prospects for solitude too daunting to tackle
without a dedicated partner (with whom they can share the
solitude).
Yet for those who seek solitude in the strongest terms,
increasingly there is less and less of it to be found on our
hiking trails and in our national forests and parks. More
trail users and a greater diversity of user groups have made
the trails more crowded in many regions. In these regions
and others, our public lands are increasingly used as well
for motorized recreation, the impacts of which we see and
hear with greater frequency, whether at length or directly
along the trail corridor. High-standard roadways bisect our
long-distance trails at ever shorter intervals. And where
our trails leave the larger tracts of public land to travel
on narrow corridors or easements, residential and commercial
development moves steadily closer.
Solitude, under these circumstances, becomes an ever more
rare commodity. And long-distance hikers, in particular, are
vulnerable by virtue of their constant, rapid linear
movement. In a day or two we’re in and out of a remote
wilderness area where others might spend a week hiking
shorter distances, intensively mining the island of solitude
available there. When it comes to opportunities for escaping
a crowded world, long-distance hikers, it seems, are the
proverbial canaries in the coalmine.
The more long walks I’ve completed, the less I see solitude as an
obstacle to my enjoyment and the more it becomes a genuine
objective of the hike. To seek solitude, now, is to abandon
myself from the ills of modern life, and the more I find of
solitude the higher my hopes for a fragile planet. In the
months and miles spent along the AT and PCT, like many other
long-distance hikers I’ve undoubtedly experienced a great
deal of alone time, either physically or emotionally, and to
an extent it’s made me who I am today. It has become a part
of what draws me back to the trail experience again
and again.
As my expectations for solitude have shifted over time, I’ve
found myself drawn toward different experiences, such as the
Grand Enchantment Trail project. Where solitude existed on other trails before, it had been less well defined for me, either as I did not yet know quite how to see it, or certainly because it was often less dramatically presented. Had solitude meant a week of seeing no vehicles throughout the roadless High Sierra with the caveat of seeing many of my fellow hikers? Or was solitude, perhaps, an extended stretch along the Pennsylvania A.T., southbound in fall with no other hikers encountered (but with plenty of busy road crossings)? Each of these solitude experiences were interesting novelties in their own way, but “full solitude” was a much less common occurrence.
On the CDT, and especially now the GET, I’ve become better acquainted with the notion of “full solitude,” or “full-day solitude.” It’s one of those things that can’t be predicted, but that usually puts a silly grin on my face at day’s end, when, rolling into camp, I suddenly realize that the entire day has passed without intrusion from the outside world – no people and no vehicles, no signs of man. It’s not that I take pleasure in being misanthropic – I’m really not. But perhaps what it is, at long last, is a readiness to distinguish and to relish the distinction between what is and is not natural and untamed, a recognition that the unnatural, tamed existence will always be there, filling up the majority of my days. Better, now, to embrace the solitude I’ve been granted as a rare and precious gift.
With these thoughts in mind, I headed out this spring on my 5th hike along the Grand Enchantment (this one a section hike). As on previous GET forays I found my solitude. I experienced a few familiar stints of “full-day solitude” – no people, no vehicles – as well as the occasional stretches of “full-day sensory solitude” (no people or vehicles near or far, seen or heard). In one case I went 6 straight days in “full-day sensory solitude” mode, which was absolutely staggering and, as it turns out, became the inspiration for this banter here, as well as a solitude log.
My ”solitude log” is nothing more than an account of my day-to-day encounters along the trail with other resource users and society at large. As it turned out, while reflecting upon my hike it wasn’t difficult to recall whatever encounters had occurred each day. And so I broke out the information into table format. I probably went overboard with the concept, but in any case, for anyone interested here’s the resulting log:
http://www.simblissity.net/get/get-solitude.shtml
The blue shading offers a visual depiction of my “full-day solitude” days. The frequency of such days seems noteworthy given that I hiked this portion of the route during prime hiking season, both in terms of GET thru-hiking, and generally speaking, for outdoor recreation in this region. The table ends with a bit of statistical analysis (groan, snore…), and as the grand finale tabulation:
Percentage of Total Hiking Days offering full-day solitude: 46%
Stay with me folks, that’s nearly one in two! Given that most of the other days were also mostly solitude-filled – a hiker here, a passing vehicle there – this hike felt more like walking on the back side of the moon. (Never mind that the sun was shining, there was mostly plenty of water to drink, and the desert was in bloom.)
I loved every minute of it!
But that’s me. And for anyone similarly disposed, know that this is only one such opportunity for achieving solitude, the great antidote to modern life. Granted, there were surely also times and places along the GET where modern life had run amuck, where the aforementioned ills do exist and where in some cases they now appear more threatening than ever.
Where else do we continue to find solitude on our long-distance trails and within our system of public lands? Where can we travel, thru-hiker style, and still escape from the outside world and our fellow man for a time? For that matter, where is our solitude, like our public lands themselves, threatened by encroachment and overuse? At the top of the Solitude Log, at the URL above, is a link to download a blank log for your own use. Open it as a spreadsheet within MS Excel or Quattro, and adjust the number of rows as necessary to accommodate the length of your hike.
The notion of “getting away from it all” is not the only source of satisfaction in heading out on a long walk. But for some of us, it is equally compelling as the memories of hiker friendships and the wonderful trail town indulgences along the way. Our moments spent walking in solitude can also say much about the health of the natural world that is the cornerstone of our trail experiences. Let these moments speak when next you venture afoot, and then share them with the world upon your return.
The Great Western Loop 5 June, 2007
Posted by blisterfree in Uncategorized.add a comment
As I recall, Andy had posted to the forum a few months back about
his plans to hike the Great Western Loop this year. Sure
enough, he’s out there now, and anyone interested in
following his progress can do so via his website:
www.andrewskurka.com
There’s some interesting content here already, including
podcasts, video clips, interviews, and photos. Some of the
content is supported by Backpacking Light magazine
(www.backpackinglight.com), and in particular I recommend
listening to podcast #3 (of 3) regarding his philosophy of
lightweight hiking and also the higher purpose for his 6000+
mile walk.
Andy’s already completed the first big hurdle of the walk -
a traverse of western Arizona and the Colorado desert of
southern California. I was especially interested in this
trailless, mostly cross-country segment of the GWL, as I’d
also envisioned a route through this territory as a means of
connecting the GET all the way to the PCT. Before the hike,
I shared with Andy a few of my abstract ideas for such a
passage, a good deal of which he appears to have implemented
successfully. I look forward to hearing more about his
experiences after he finishes.
And speaking of finishing, the home stretch will find Andy
on the GET, which he’ll use to connect the CDT to the
Arizona Trail, then hike the AZT north to the Grand Canyon,
his point of origin on the loop. I suppose he’ll be passing
through this neck of the woods sometime in mid to late
autumn. Nothing, by then, will phase him, probably. 30+ mile
days on the GET? In his case, I’d be willing to bet on it!
the Grand Enchantment Trail (and my grand re-education from this season’s hikers) 11 May, 2007
Posted by blisterfree in Uncategorized.add a comment
Following my Grand Enchantment Trail hike this spring I returned from New Mexico to southern Arizona.
Mid-April in the Sonoran – nearly a month and a half since I’d starting walking in the Superstitions, a lackluster year it had seemed for the bloom. But a lot can change in 40 days in the desert. Rain can fall, and it can make a difference. Oh what a difference it can make! The few wildflowers I’d seen in March - ephemerals, annuals – had less use for this belated nourishment, having banked on winter moisture mediocre at best this year. But for the cactus – the late bloomers – a few days’ good soaking in late March was all it took to turn the tide. Now the desert at last was alive! Englemann prickly pear, each bristly pad bearing a big, waxy, yellow flower, soft to the touch and defenselessly free of thorns. Hedgehog cactus, small and often unnoticed, now impossible to ignore for their vibrant fuchsia display. And everywhere the ocotillo, dead sticks no more, now heavy in a coat of tiny green leaves, each waving tendril topped with a drooping flourish of punch bowl red. Christmas colors under the April sun, a kind of madness. A psychedelia insisting, not that I retire for the season to the shade, but to keep going; to start my hike all over again, and move on endlessly with the heat and sun; that I’d begun the first time much too early, rather than in caution too late. Something a-buzz in the desert air, reminding us while we’re alive that it’s never too late to begin again.
The Sonoran desert is a land chock full of paradoxes. Full of thorns but green and lush. Dry but wet by desert standards. Beautiful and enticing to behold at length, yet rugged and challenging to know up close. Spend enough time here, though, and the paradoxical becomes reconciliable. The land remains strange and wondrous, but the shock value eventually wears off. The thorns become an expected price to pay for every patch of shade-tree greenery. Water is still too far apart, but you learn to know where it’ll be, and that, ultimately, it won’t be too far to reach. The trails will be vague and rough, if there’s even a trail, but the scenery will always make up for it - assuming there’s anything to apologize for. And what of the sun and heat? It’s hotter back in the city of course, and the city seems to add a few thousand eager new residents every month. You just get used to it out here after awhile. But it does take time.
I am not a native of Arizona, nor do I live here now. But I have. I’ve spent time in the mountains outside Tucson, hiking all of the trails I could manage on weekends, supporting myself with odd jobs in town the other days. I had only a bicycle for transportation back then, so whenever the urge to go farther afield became unbearable I’d dump my meager savings into a rental car, travel around the state in search of backcountry adventure. I’ve lived in New Mexico too, and following the same general theme. And I’ve been back to southern Arizona again. I’ve worked as a landscaper here in the mid-day murder of June and July, saving up for other adventures: the PCT, maybe the CDT one day. And I’ve walked the Arizona Trail, thru-hiking from Mexico to Utah – or whatever I could actually find of the trail to hike. But somewhere along the way it happened. I can’t say exactly when, and I can’t claim ownership of the experience. Like many others who’ve spent extended time in these parts – be they day hikers smiling under 100 degree heat in the Superstitions, or mountain bikers proudly bearing cactus-induced battle scars, or any of the dozens who now can claim an Arizona Trail end-to-end completion – the desert has changed me too. It’s changed my mind about deserts. Somewhere along the way the Sonoran, in spite of its occasional bad habits, became my friend. And friends can never fail.
The psychological advantage of “having the desert on your side” is huge. In fact it’s so big that I seem to have completely missed it. Instead I’ve spent more than a fair amount of time promoting the GET from an emotional place, presenting its face as I see it and not always as it objectively happens to be. Pretty pictures and gushing prose can inspire, and that can be a good thing, but only a personal familiarity with desert hiking can ground that inspiration in reality. Better that the GET website help to confirm one’s interest in such a hike, than try to create that interest out of the blue. I recognize this now, but unfortunately not in time to help, at least this go-round. For this I apologize. I know lives were put on hold this spring, money was earned and spent, plans were set in motion. Some have mentioned having a grand adventure all the same. It’s heartening to hear.
The future of thru-hiking along this route belongs to the person who can dispense with my ramblings, grab some maps, and simply go. Having thru-hiked other trails is no guaranteed prerequisite. Nor does the weekend hiker, hardened desert explorer but new to thru-hiking, choose well in this particular endeavor. This would seem to be an ultimate paradox, excluding all possible candidates. Only the next successful GET thru-hiker can solve this riddle. (It’s happened before.)
In the meantime, I intend to continue writing the online guidebook and to update the town guide, water chart, etc. Thru-hiking is not the only way to explore the route, of course. And it’ll help to provide a better understanding of the route’s layout to those who might express an interest in helping to improve trail conditions, or protection for the route wherever threatened by development.
For those who may be thinking of trying a long hike along the GET, I’d like to emphasize that an eastbound hike in springtime is not the only way to experience the route. In fact it’s more challenging in many respects than a westbound hike in autumn. It’s often less challenging in terms of finding water, but springtime heat, sun, snowpack, and creek fording can certainly trump the water advantage, or so I’m learning. The westbound thru-hiker begins at Sandia Crest – the eastbounder’s “Mt Katahdin” – and experiences a combination of high, forested mountain hiking interspersed with more moderate desert environments, not at all unlike the CDT in New Mexico. Thusly hardened, the westbounder heads into Arizona, with its more extreme topography, harsher deserts, and rougher trails. And here the hiker arrives late enough in autumn to avoid the conspiracy of sun and heat that in springtime can compound the challenges.
I’ve travelled the route in both directions, but refuse to play favorites. The aspens in fall color, or the desert in bloom? Early morning bird song along Aravaipa Creek, or an evening of bugling elk in the Black Range? One final mountain range to climb, or one last waving saguaro to tip my hat toward? In the end it doesn’t matter to me, as long as I get to come back. As long as this wild land beckons, and a way exists to heed its familiar call.
G.E.T. Conditions Update – Clifton thru Winston 5 May, 2007
Posted by blisterfree in notes from the field.add a comment
You’ve read that right – thru WINSTON. Anyone who’s perused the Grand Enchantment Trail website, and maybe this lonely corner of New Mexico, knows the town of Winston is the Bermuda Triangle of the route. What goes in, maybe doesn’t come back out! It’s nearly the truth, as I’ll explain.
First a disclaimer. I left Clifton on March 29, and have been off the route since April 12. So as updates go, this one is more of a history lesson. We’re moving toward post-season along the route now, and it’s doubtful anyone is out there anyway, but if anyone is or has plans to go, take the following with a pinch of salt, especially with regard to water.
Segment 15
At last report I’d been holed up in Clifton with gear issues, and gazing with some concern upon a boisterous San Francisco River through town. I’d attempted the practice ford as shown on the GET map set, and didn’t like how it went – either shallow with cobbles and quick, or waist/chest deep and still not slow, and usually some of each between banks. As I expected, the sand bar mentioned in the guidebook, visible from the bridge along FR 212, was submerged. This is a good indicator of fording prospects; when the sand bar is exposed, all should be well, otherwise attempt the practice ford before heading eastbound along the route.
Leaving town the next day (3/30) the river seemed just a bit lower, but I wouldn’t know anything for sure until reaching Segment 16. Meanwhile I followed the main GET route up Limestone Gulch to the Hickey Spring Trail, which I reblazed with a more durable flagging tape. This should last a couple seasons at least, and along with my recent brushing work along this heretofore neglected trail I expect the hiking throngs will be pouring in any day now. Meanwhile Segment 15 remains one of my favorites along the route, big on solitude and high desert grassland scenery.
Segment 16
This segment now begins where the “pack trail” shown on the map meets the San Francisco. I reached the river here on the afternoon of 3/31, and decided to bushwhack around the first two fords, arguably among the most difficult. As I was making up my mind, two guys floated by on double-hulled kayaks. “The Blue was kind of scary,” one of them shouted back, meaning shallow for the boats, but scarier for me was that they had made it at all. My first ford, the third of 14 in series, seemed more difficult than it had in the record-wet spring of ‘05. So did the next ford. But farther on, the deeper fords that I remembered were above my waist that year seemed to be lower now, and not as fast. I camped half-way along, and by next morning (4/1) the remaining fords seemed easier still. I became convinced that the river was dropping by the hour, and at some point had dropped below the levels of two years ago. Checking the USGS streamflow stats now, this does indeed appear to have been the case.
San Francisco River this spring: http://tinyurl.com/345bx5
Spring of ‘05: http://tinyurl.com/2lkte6
So the threshhold for manageable fording appears to be around 350 cfs. More volume than this, and it’ll be at or above the waist at the cut-bank of almost every ford. Less than 300 cfs, and only the legs get wet, current shouldn’t demand too much strength or concentration. Below 200 cfs, it’s a creek slosh. (Below 100 cfs, the ATV’s show up!)
The Blue River was fairly easy by comparison – knee deep or less – and the trackless walking not as rough this year due to scouring of the banks during last summer’s floods. I found some nice obsidian pieces scattered at creekside, and farther along, I sighted my first ever band of coatimundi! About a dozen of them in and among a grove of sycamores scattered upon my approach, huge brown tails raised in their distinctive arc. One curious fellow approached me for a better look, as vaguely witnessed here. I was surprised to encounter coatis this far east in Arizona, though I later discovered that their range extends into SW New Mexico as well.
Segment 17
The Wild Bunch Trail over the Blue Range was in decent shape, with water available in all the usual spots. I reflagged a bit along the higher ridges, where a spotty old burn continues to fell the odd ponderosa. “Weed-thorns” (the woody, higher elevation variety) need removal where the Horse Canyon Trail runs along the exposed east flanks of Maple Peak, but it’s not a job I intend to tackle solo with loppers! Cattle should probably be kept out of the burn area toward Charlie Moore Mountain, where the impact of hooves is taking a toll, though I tend to doubt the distant Apache NF district offices lose much sleep over the border region here.
I ran into a real-life backcountry cowboy, with his teenage son, both on horseback looking for wayward cattle up among the pines. The two were based out of Alma NM, and I received an earfull about everything from the Forest Service to environmentalists, wolves, mountain lions, and whatever else that might seem to stand between a rancher and his big fat bottom line. I was left with the however-accurate impression that ranchers and cattle are persona non grata in much of the Gila NF these days, thus the need for his backwoods travailles across the border into AZ. Mexican gray wolves, he asserted, now number “in the hundreds,” despite official figures claiming only a few dozen.
Segment 18
After an amazing night hike, walking into a rising full moon framing the Mogollon Mountains, I found good water in Vigil Canyon and made a late camp. Reliability unknown, but this is the only natural surface water in the segment, save for the San Francisco River when flowing. To find it, eastbound follow the roadwalk route across the dry drainage, then as it parallels it on the south. The drainage heads away from the road, then returns, now in a shallow gorge. Find a way the 25ft down into the gorge and look for pools in the bedrock bottom, among sycamores.
In the morning I heard a roadrunner. *Heard* is the operative word here. A deep, staccato, “whoop,” if I recall correctly. These birds are generally silent. I had absolutely no idea what animal was making the sound until I emerged from my tent to find him glaring at the object of his interest from a rock a few yards away. Then the two of them were off.
A typically diminished river here, the San Francisco was flowing ankle-deep where it crosses the county road just west of Alma. I made it into town in time for a late breakfast at the efficiently-named Alma Grill. This was my first time in, and I suspect it won’t be my last. I informed the waitress that she was serving up the best food in Alma, to which she laughed, before I assured her that I meant Glenwood too! Too bad neither the Alma Store nor Glenwood Trading Post have enough trail food to make trail life so comfy, or Glenwood and its P.O. might be entirely skippable. Unparticular hikers (like me this time) might be able to get by.
The cultural disparity between Clifton and Alma/Glenwood is remarkable. The former, though itself a small remote town, nonetheless feels linked to the modern world – even Phoenix – by the industrial mining trade at Morenci. One can see it on faces in town, hear it in the conversations, and in the music blaring from car radios during the orderly procession of traffic at “quittin’ time.” Alma, by contrast, is pure southwest New Mexico cowboy country, the anglo conservative base to Clifton’s more liberal multi-cultural leanings. Quite unintentionally, the two towns have absolutely nothing to do with each other, and the folks don’t comingle. Most have likely never been to the other; the towns are separated by many miles of forking 2-lane highways and no good reason to go. Only the backcountry traveler bridges this gap in time and space, and in 3 days along the GET moves between worlds apart, a lone vessel for this awareness.
Segments 19-21
The Mogollons Mountains still appeared to hold a lot of snow up high, so I opted to detour widely around them, first via the Mineral Creek Trail. I’d been wanting to explore this route as an alternative to the snow-detour advice detailed on the GET maps, namely entering the Gila Wilderness at the Catwalk, then bailing out of Whitewater Creek at Redstone Park and up to the Bursum Road. The Mineral Creek Trail by contrast would offer a more direct approach to the Bursum Road and the continuation of the detour around the Mogollons. And it might be nice and scenic in its own right.
It is. It’s also a lot of work following the trail, at least along the first few miles of Mineral Creek where last summer’s floods scoured the drainage from wall to wall. It’s a narrow canyon through here, not unlike the Catwalk but without the crowds or elevated pedestrian walkway. It’s easy to lose the trail where it’s washed out along the banks, and searching through the brush is work here. Finally conditions improved a bit, though the trail seemed endless, fording back and forth with few good bearings or signs to indicate progress. Scattered throughout were numerous old mining operations and encampments – curious piles of stone, heaps of timbers, and occasional iron works wherever the creek banks accommodated. One huge iron relic had been constructed in Indianapolis, of all places. Mineral Creek Canyon is surely a wilder place now, and is certainly more difficult to travel than Whitewater Creek. I’d recommend it to those who’ve already seen the latter, and who have reason to avoid the Mogollons and make time.
I continued up South Fork Mineral Creek Trail to the Bursum Road, where water was available in snowmelt pools at roadside, the snow largely clear from the roadway and forest here at 8800′. Farther down the road I entered the perimeter of last summer’s Bear Fire, which burned with varying degrees of intensity over a large area just north of the Gila Wilderness. I also believe I heard a wolf in this stretch, a brief howl from somewhere a good distance away to the north, deeper and more liquid than a coyote’s, without the barking introduction. The possibility seemed more tangible when I came across a set of large canine tracks the next day. These were along the Middle Fork of the Gila River, which I opted to follow instead of the GET’s preferred West Fork, mostly out of curiosity. I’d also bypassed the Middle Fork during my CDT hike in 2003, and was eager to experience it and compare the two. Both canyons have outstanding beauty, the Middle Fork seeming to spend extended miles in a scenic but milder, more expansive topography, while the West Fork is more hemmed in, featuring more tall spires and stuff to gawk at but it’s limited to fewer trail miles.
I found no other human footprints along the Middle Fork so early this spring, so the canine tracks surely were not those of man’s best friend.
The Gila’s Middle and West Forks were each flowing at 70 cfs or less, fordable without issue, although the beds of each creek can be slippery where solid rock. I linked the two creeks using the CDTS route, the trails of which are very popular with equestrians in this stretch and getting wider and rockier each year.
Segment 22
Day before Easter at Doc Campbell’s Post, and I arrived to live entertainment, compliments of a local guitarist and artist who was serenading passersby, his wares on display out front. Hearing original folk songs about the Gila River after hiking it is neat! Otherwise, Doc’s was its familiar self – not much to eat but the ice cream was good. A dozen or more yellow bottles of HEET were on display by the front window. Paul the owner stepped outside briefly, explaining to an incredulous motorist how to inflate his car tire by mouth, because the air pump (functional, on premises) “will run for half an hour.” It was a good time.
Easter morning while breaking camp near Little Creek just outside Gila Hot Springs I thought it odd to hear a white-winged dove calling. According to the Gila National Forest “bird handout” I found at the Cliff Dwelling’s Visitors Center, white-winged doves – the familiar “who-cooks-for-you” doves of metro Tucson and Phoenix – are considered uncommon in this area.
The GET heads up the Middle Fork for a few miles, then over North Mesa to the East Fork. This was the easiest of all, just a single ford, a quick splash across its gentle flow, as usually it seems to be. The Black Range from which it drains just doesn’t receive snowpack like the taller Mogollon Mountains. Diamond Creek also presented easy fords, and the social trail along it was better defined than a year and a half ago, likely due to increased equestrian use by “Links Ranch” as shown on maps.
I added to existing flagging, showing the way over to Tom Moore Canyon via the GET’s little-used trails in this remote part of the Gila. A herd of a dozen elk were grazing in Tom Moore, unaware of my presence some 200 yards away. Although I remained motionless in the gathering dusk, I was standing upwind of them. A head went up, signaling unease. It went back down and grazing continued. Up again, then another. Without actually spotting me the group instinctively bounded away from my scent, then bunched together partway up the hillside, watching with seeming relief as my movements betrayed me as human. This was springtime, after all, not hunting season. They moved on at length, more casually this time. I was not a wolf, or a mountain lion.
Tom Moore Canyon had water, starting just above the box, then again as a flowing creeklet a few miles farther up-canyon. Incongruously, I found a small notepad in the road along FR 150, full of names and phone numbers and written in Spanish. It appeared to have been lying there for some time. This would be my one vestige of humanity between Gila Hot Springs and Winston; no people, no vehicles the entire way. (More on GET prospects for solitude in a follow-up note.)
Segment 23
Into the Aldo Leopold Wilderness, just beyond the Me Own Helitack Site, then around Me Own Hill following Me Own Trail, but accidentally dropping down to Me Own Tank, which was full. Some of the signs around here list “Meown,” as if to be extra clever.
South Diamond Creek presented chilly but generally ankle-deep crossings. I was reminded again of the widespread effects of last summer’s floods, noting places where the creekbanks had eroded into the trail, leaving steep little dropoffs to maneuver around. Approaching the Black Range I entered the burn zone in Burnt Canyon, which historically hasn’t always been burnt. The latest burn is fairly recent, but the trail here has seen a crew and is in fine shape approaching the Divide.
Segment 24
Thus ends the GET’s own unique route through Gila country, here joining the CDT official route north along the crest of the Black Range. This whole stretch through the Gila is arguably the highlight of the GET experience, mile after mile of nearly seamless travel along established trails, with plenty of water, wildlife and shade, but few road crossings and even fewer people.
Diamond Peak (9800′) held no snow to speak of, though it offered views south to taller Reeds Peak which did. Diamond Peak Spring was meager but usable, and could certainly stand to be improved before the trail that slabs across it finally causes its demise.
I found water south of Fishermans Bluff, where the trail crosses a small wooden bridge over a minor drainage (near the T in ‘Continental’ on USGS maps). This creeklet seems to flow in springtime during and following the snowpack melt. North of Fishermans Bluff I added fresh flagging in the burn, which has now felled most trees over a trail distance of half a mile, not presenting a blowdown hassle so much as a routefinding issue. The standing trees seem well-anchored and the flagging will hopefully keep for a couple of seasons or until crews can perform rehab.
Chloride Creek and the drainage feeding it from the south both held plenty of water; in three hikes, both spring and fall, I’ve never seen these dry.
I left the CDT / GET before the end of GET Segment 24, at the crossing of FR 226. As usual, I wanted to keep going but had run out of time. Down to Winston, I decided. I hadn’t yet been there, despite its being a genuine GET Trail Town, listed in the Town Guide along with all sorts of unverified hearsay about it. From Winston I’d try hitching out to Truth or Consequences, where I could catch a bus.
Less than a mile east of the Divide on FR 226 I came to Monument Park Cabin, operated by the Forest Service, locked but available for rent, apparently. The covered front porch was accessible, and the setting was beautiful. Even a regulation FS toilet sat across the road.
Farther down the road, a strange thing happened around sunset. An elk emerged from the brush and walked across the road, back into the brush. Not so strange. But then as I continued on a few feet a group of 4 or 5 cattle spooked from the same area. Not as casual, the cows bolted down the road away from me. Looking off the road, down where the cows had been, I saw a large bull elk standing idly by, gazing at me indolently. Obviously the cows and elk had been feeding, or possibly watering, in a group of sorts, each accepting the other’s presence. And possibly benefiting from it, I imagined, in terms of scouting for danger. Maybe the elk knew the cows would play the canary in the coalmine, singing at everything – my presence in this case. In any event, the bull elk finally turned and trotted off, probably more annoyed than concerned.
I camped back at Chloride Creek, then the next morning followed the 4WD road without traffic for the remaining long miles out to civilization. (12 miles total, 3000′+ elevation loss) This is no resupply route for GET or CDT hikers, for sure. The town of Chloride would be a ghost town, I knew, but no! People here, habitable structures. Even a functional storefront, aimed at the occasional auto tourist heading here on the so-called “Geronimo Trail.” I spoke with the proprietor, a lifelong resident, who told me about cabins for rent in town, and also more about Chloride Creek, which she said ceased flowing year-round in 1978. Now it runs only sporadically, as the snow melts in spring and whenever it rains enough. I liked Chloride, virtually serviceless though it was. The nearby Cuchillo Hills looked inviting, a remote island of a range only tall enough to support a sea of lion-colored grasses and the occasional juniper.
Winston, by contrast, appeared to be in a slump. Many of the yards I passed were stockpiled with unknowable junk. I found the Winston Saloon, right in the midst of this setting, then across the street noted the now-defunct Winston Bed & Breakfast. Main Street appeared vacant except for a gas company worker running about reading meters. He pointed me up the road to the Winston General Store, the meat and potatoes of town life. Here I found mostly snack foods, along with fresh-made microwaveable sandwiches and burritos. Better still was the Winston General Store Official Merchandise: I scored a namesake camo ball cap, which I assured the bemused clerk would improve my chances of catching a ride out of town.
It didn’t. But then I didn’t care to walk, knowing it was 40 paved miles to T or C, with little public land or water en route. T or C now has a taxi company, but the driver won’t run beyond city limits. Out with the thumb. How hard can it be to get a lift? Actually I’d had a fitful night’s sleep, worrying about this hitch. I’d even formulated a plan to buy a used bicycle in Winston, if available. None were. “Some days the road gets traffic, other days not much,” the clerk advised me. “How has today been?” I’d asked. “Kind of slow,” she’d replied.
NM Highway 52 runs through Winston, a straight shot from T or C. Almost all traffic heading east goes to T or C. So it’s not a problem once the vehicle pulls over, it’s finding one to hail. I stood around for about an hour, during which time a total of 3 cars passed, all heading the other way. Little did I know how remote the DIVIDE was, I now thought!
Finally a large van pulled over, miners carpooling home from the nearby St. Cloud mine. Thanks, miners. I learned a bit about the operation, though never did figure out what they were mining. It wasn’t copper. And in any case, I felt overwhelmed just being in a moving vehicle, speeding down the rollercoaster highway at a commuter’s pace, my first car trip since my shuttle had dropped me at the foot of the Superstitions, some 40 days prior.
It was a fun, rewarding, and as always, a challenging trip. I hope to return to the GET this fall, heading westbound from Albuquerque. I’ll probably bypass Winston, though.
Trip report (posted on behalf of…) 12 April, 2007
Posted by blisterfree in notes from the field.add a comment
Friends Hiking Club (www.friendshiking.com) did the Safford-Morenci seg 13. See the
hike description at HikeArizona (www.hikearizona.com/decoder.php?ZTN=10243).
Many thanks to simblissity for for the best available info for this trail!
(Please note – A free HikeAZ membership is required to view the above link, which includes a trip report with photos. The text portion of this entry only appears below.)
Historic trail rises again……
by hikeazFirst, a little background on the origins of this trail….
Farmers and merchants in the mid-1870s pieced together the Safford-Morenci Trail to pack their goods to the mining country. The ragtag route faded from memory once automobiles came on the scene. Consequently, the trail never made modern maps. Generally, the original route of the Safford-Morenci Trail headed northward from Safford into the Gila Mountains, writhed through Johnny Creek Canyon, waded Bonita Creek, climbed up colorful cliffs in Midnight Canyon, stood upon 6,800-foot-high Bellmeyer Saddle, dropped into South Smith Canyon, crossed Eagle Creek, then followed Gold Gulch into Morenci. Though this journey takes hikers through some extraordinarily scenic country rich in natural and human history, the unmapped trail also demands good-to-excellent hiking and route-finding skills as it picks through challenging terrain with few trail signs and fewer water sources. The Safford-Morenci Trail follows a combination of foot trail, 4WD tracks, and cross-county drainages, and features occasional brown and (older) green metal signs marked “TRAIL.” You may also encounter flagging tape along the way, such as in South Smith Canyon where a finalized route in the drainage has been scouted.
“Crack!” went the GPS on the ground as we were making our final preparations to leave the east trailhead of the Safford-Morenci Trail. Not a good omen on a trail that has little to no trail markers. Luckily, only a portion of the screen remained black, so we could at least establish our position and compare it to our topographic maps when necessary.
After a missed turn when locating the trailhead on the drive in (don’t be deceived; just past the Eagle Creek Pump Station you want to make the turn to the right that appears to lead into private property), we were a bit behind schedule, and were ready to hit the trail. We had decided to hike this trail east to west, and, in retrospect, were glad that we did.
(Mile 0) The trail starts out up an abandoned 4×4/wagon road in making its way gradually uphill to Smith Spring, which is on the site of an old homestead, best we could tell. The spring (mile .7 +/-) was flowing quite well with sweet water bubbling forth from the small tank. From there the “road” walking continues uphill on a gradual slope, all the time in the wash. The fist to small football-sized rocks made for a bit of tedious hiking, but the abundant tree cover made it a beautiful hike nonetheless. Eventually, the “road” peters out and a trail forms. Through this area you should encounter some small signs with “trail” marked on them, as well as occasional orange flagging tape. This trail, wonderfully earthy and mossy smelling, follows next to the wash, crossing it numerous times. After about three miles, the trail will begin to steepen, and it is sometimes VERY steep. Not to worry, though, as this signals your approach to Bellmeyer Saddle. In this steep section (remember this is March) we found a flowing spring about 10 minutes below the saddle. As you reach the saddle (Mile 4+/-) and catch your breath, prepare to have it taken away as you take in the views of lower Midnight Canyon, upper Bonita Creek, the Gila Mountains, and beyond, floating like a mirage on the horizon, the high crest of the Pinaleno Range. As we made our way off the saddle, we descended into Midnight Canyon, starting on a tight zigzag down brittle volcanic cliffs. We decided to make a detour to Toppy’s Spring, which is shown on the topographic map. The spring pours over a cliff, allowing us a well-earned shower. The area near the falls is lush, with almost tropical-looking plants. Back on the trail after our side-trip, it is mostly road walking now, and although the views are outstanding, the road walking was less than. The road switchbacks on two separate occasions and after the second, the trail will veer into the wash and the road climbs up and out of the wash to the left. This, for us, was a great spot for a rest, as there is a gigantic juniper at this point (Mile 7.2+/-). As we resumed hiking, now in the creek-bed, we noticed chalk-like bands of soft rock within the normal sediment, and we commented that we had not seen that before. The hike continues down Midnight Canyon through a series of slot narrows that are awe-inspiring. With the creek running under-foot and the serpentine narrows, it was as if we were on another planet. Red walls reaching skyward were close enough on each side that by straddling the creek you could touch both walls. Look up and watch for the single boulder that lies precariously across the canyon. After about a mile from where we diverged from the road, the canyon widens, signaling Midnight’s junction with Bonita Creek. We had arranged to meet a few friends at Bonita who had hiked in from the west trailhead and spotted them straight-away. After a round of “hey, guess what we saw…..”, we proceeded with our sundry chores.
After a night of campfire tales and s’mores, carried in by one of our group, we had a fitful night’s sleep. The weather, overcast and cool in the morning, had heated up throughout the day to about 78, but still remained at about 60 at 9PM.. You may want to make the side trip up Bonita Creek to the Old Lady Gay Cabin, about a mile upstream. At the Midnight-Bonita confluence, there is also a granary high up on the south-facing cliff.
Well, dawn brought a bright, sunny day for our remaining hike west. After a morning of coffee and cards we set out, briefly bidding adieu to our friends. We crossed Bonita Creek (following orange flagging tape) at the beaver dam. Safely across the creek after filling our bottles, we headed up Johnny Creek, our early morning feet objecting slightly to the cobbles. After about 7/10 of a mile, there will be a trail that climbs steeply out of the drainage to your right (creek left). This trail climbs up to bypass a series of pour-offs and boulder jams. If you miss this trail turn-off you will be turned back by the boulder jam and can re-trace your steps about ¼ mile to the trail. While on this “high-trail”, take a moment to edge over and check out the canyon that you are bypassing. When we were here the creek was running quite well and was showing off its series of falls….nice.
After bypassing these impediments, the trail drops back in the creek-bed and it is cobble hiking again. If it is running like when WE were there, do not bother trying to keep your shoes dry. You’ll save time and energy by just admitting defeat and stepping into the creek. To a degree, this hiking is tedious, but this canyon holds many awesome sights; it gets prettier by the mile. The cobbles are often broken up by roads of bedrock. The hike leaves the creek-bed after about 3 miles, switch-backing up an old road to the left (creek right). The road climbs up out of the creek and makes its way over undulating hills for about two miles where it intersects a gulch. As you climb up this gulch you will crisscross it numerous times. As you check your back-trail, remember to look out over what you have just hiked… this is beautiful, wild country. You will begin to see that the trail is rock-lined at this point, and you will continue to see this, intermittently, all the way to the west trailhead. As you reach the head of this gulch you will have reached the last high spot, and it’s all downhill from here all the way to the west trailhead.
- Apr 03 2007 hikeaz & Moovyoaz
update – Safford to Clifton 29 March, 2007
Posted by blisterfree in notes from the field.add a comment
Well, the hike continues to move at what would appear to be a snail’s pace. Such is the nature of the beast in my case, hiking the route in addition to whatever additional effort I can muster on behalf of the trail corridor. Lucky for the route, my efforts have been greatly surpassed in this section by trail crews who are currently reconstructing the Old Safford-Morenci Trail. Their efforts have been ongoing for several seasons, and it’s now really coming together. The stretch of trail in South Smith Canyon, on the east end, appears finished now and is a joy to hike. This is in addition to new construction and maintenance on other portions of the 15 mile trail. Apparently the final piece will be a realignment of the route in Johnny Creek Canyon, sending it north of the canyon itself, eliminating the rugged cross-country walk in the drainage. In the meantime this remains the most rugged portion of the S-M-T, and is currently a flowing creek due to recent rains.
Segment 11
Backtracking for a moment… I was able to walk the newly proposed GET route out of Safford, which now bypasses downtown in favor of a quieter walk on the rural fringes. It looks possible to shortcut across Freeman Flat to Discovery Park Blvd, although most hikers will probably walk a variation on the Safford Loop idea depicted on the map set. The town is currently working on building a system of bike routes and lanes, some of which may one day be an option for GET hikers while heading into and out of town. In any case, the current route from Discovery Park Blvd onto Solomon Rd is pleasant enough (for a paved road walk). For hikers who tend to drink a lot of water, Solomon Rd offers one good option for dealing with the after-effects – where the road crosses the San Simon River (dry), a concealing riparian area is at hiker’s left.
The town of Solomon was a pleasant surprise. This is a small community that feels a world apart from more modern Safford. Services in town are bypassed by Highway 70, so to visit Solomon is to comingle with the locals. In addition to the post office, the town has a small convenience store – C.D.’s Quick Stop – on Bowie Ave, one block south of Hwy 70, offering drinking water, snacks, and microwave foods. Open 7 days. A Mexican-American restaurant, La Paloma, is nearby, open for lunch and dinner, closed Sundays. The town also has a bar with menu, currently closed pending new ownership.
Segment 12
The route north from Solomon also works fairly well. The stretch from Tidwell Wash north to Solomon Pass Road is straightforward and mostly silent. Solomon Pass Rd carries some vehicle traffic, mostly recreational in nature. Here I found water at Rattlesnake Tank corral (trough with float valve), as well several good pools in the drainage containing Boo Tank. Bear Spring, just before the Safford-Morenci Trailhead, also had plenty of water.
Segment 13
Plenty of water here too, including the drainages crossed within the first mile. Johnny Creek was flowing, and will certainly have pools well into the spring months. The creek added to the ruggedness of the rocky drainage walk here, but it’s no big deal for trail-hardened hikers. Bonita Creek was an easy ford as usual, although it’s probably not an ideal water source for drinking, due to much beaver activity in the area – including a dam right where the route crosses, and a lodge just upstream. (I heard tails territorially slapping the water as I approached after nightfall.) There’s also water just beyond in Midnight Canyon, and then again in South Smith Canyon. Smith Spring was its usual fine-tasting self.
From Bellmeyer Saddle, the Safford-Morenci Trail offers far-ranging views to the west, and also a glimpse of the Morenci Mine to the east. Beyond the mine, I noticed for the first time the Mogollon Mountains looming in the distance, highlighted as they were with snow on their summits. Mogollon Baldy appeared to be snow-covered even on its west-facing slopes, perhaps down to an elevation of 10,000. North-facing slopes likely still hold snow down to 9k, although I’ll find out for sure not until the middle of next week.
Segment 14
Eagle Creek also shows beaver activity and is thigh-deep at one ford, otherwise shallow and riffley. I followed the main GET route up Gold Gulch, passable via an old burro route up the south wall, as described in the guidebook. The portion of the wall traversed here is low-angle, so exposure is only moderate and is probably not an issue for those who’ve hiked, say, the PCT in So Cal with its side-cut tread in steep terrain. The slot portion of Gold Gulch has water. Beyond the slot, and beyond the corral and 4WD shown on the map set, a side canyon joins Gold Gulch from the right. I explored this option, which avoids about a mile of the Lower Eagle Creek Road. Early on, the side canyon has one modest pour-off, which can be negotiated on its right side via footholds in the polished bedrock. Otherwise it’s a fairly easy wash walk, with some water, and utter solitude. I also found it interesting how the canyon deposited me on Eagle Creek Rd right below the Morenci mine and its enormous tailings pile – talk about startling contrasts!
In other news, the Conoco gas station/mart in Morenci (junction of US 191 and Markeen Rd) sells HEET. I bought their last bottle, but received assurances that they would stock more in the short term. The auto parts store in town no longer sells HEET, so Conoco is about the only option, save for rubbing alcohol (isopropyl) available at Basha’s supermarket.
I’m currently waylaid in Clifton awaiting some fresh gear. Meanwhile I checked out the San Francisco River north of town. Fording conditions are currently very marginal, due to continuing runoff from last week’s rains. The flow is slow where deep (waist high) and quick and turbulent where shallow (shin), with no obvious good lines of travel from bank to bank. Admittedly I don’t yet have enough experience with this river to know how conditions in this area correlate with conditions along the route in Segment 16. I intend to increase experience within the next few days. The good news is that the river is currently subsiding at a rate of about 100 cfs per day (current flow is ~450 cfs). By way of reference, the flow was around 350 cfs when I successfully (though with some difficulty) forded in spring of 2005. Barring any more substantial rain, I imagine the flow will be manageable for hikers coming along a week or two from now.
This will likely be the last entry until I finish at Monticello. I may, however, be able to convey a message or two by phone, maybe to someone who could then post word to the list.
Best of luck to anyone heading out, and stay safe,